Technical findings. Regulatory language.
We bridge the gap between what security researchers discover and what enforcement bodies need to act.
Regulators have the authority to compel disclosure. They lack the technical expertise to identify when vendors are concealing vulnerabilities.
Security researchers have the expertise to find concealed vulnerabilities. They lack the institutional standing to compel vendor action. We close both gaps simultaneously. We find the concealment, document the evidence, and translate it into language that maps directly to existing enforcement frameworks.
Who we work with.
SEC, OSC, ASIC
When silent patches in financial infrastructure create undisclosed market risk for investors on registered platforms.
OPC, ICO, CNIL
When silently patched vulnerabilities in data-handling software leave personal data exposed without notification.
FTC, Competition Bureau
When vendor concealment of security defects constitutes an unfair or deceptive practice under consumer protection law.
Enforcement-ready evidence packages.
Technical Proof
The specific vulnerability, the code location, the confirmed impact, proof-of-concept demonstration, CVSS 3.1 severity scoring, and the complete commit history showing when the vendor knew and what they did about it.
Regulatory Translation
Every technical finding accompanied by a plain-language version mapping the vulnerability to concepts the enforcement body already understands: investor exposure, custody failure, breach notification, material misrepresentation, duty of care.
Precedent Mapping
For each finding, we identify the closest enforcement precedent where a regulator pursued action for the same category of conduct. This gives your enforcement body a framework for action, not a novel theory.
Expert Support
Available as technical experts through the enforcement process: clarifying findings, responding to vendor counter-arguments, and providing testimony when needed. Evidence is packaged for adversarial scrutiny from the start.
We operate a secure whistleblower intake channel for insiders, researchers, and technical witnesses with evidence of concealed vulnerabilities.
Tips are independently verified using our detection infrastructure before escalation. Your enforcement body receives validated, evidence-backed findings without building or funding the intake infrastructure. Tipster identity is never disclosed without explicit consent.
If you have received a filing and need clarification.
Or if you are investigating a vendor’s disclosure practices and need technical expertise. Initial consultations on whether a finding meets regulatory threshold carry no charge.